feha
|
| Posted: 06/08/2002, 12:22 PM |
|
I'm doing an important project and I have to say that when started with CCS it was very difficult do it fast,still is more complicated to use it as opposite CC.
So (sadly) I had to go back with CC and finish it fast.
I'm missing lot os simplicity of CC compared to CCS.
I have printed all manual's in PDF and have read them...
I wish it was simple to use as CC.
Hope to learn it in the future.
feha
[www.vision.to]
|
|
|
 |
parsam
|
| Posted: 06/08/2002, 1:20 PM |
|
yes, CCS is not as simple as CC. It is taking lot of time to search where is what. A tutorial is required which tells HOW TO in CCS in comparison with CC. This will help the CC users a lot. YS can you do some thing on this ??
|
|
|
|
feha
|
| Posted: 06/09/2002, 2:01 PM |
|
Even CCS is more complicated to use, I don regret in any way the purchase.
I think that there is lot of potential in CCS.
I hope that Yes Software will publish some printed manuals and sell them thru their resellers in different countries.This should include some CD with examples.
I have spent about 650 A-4 pages by printing the PDF doc, and need more time to exercise some functions mentioned there.
I just wish I could use all the potential accumulated in CSS.
feha
[www.vision.to]
|
|
|
|
George P.
|
| Posted: 06/11/2002, 2:34 AM |
|
> I have spent about 650 A-4 pages by printing the PDF doc, and need more time > to exercise some functions mentioned there.
> I just wish I could use all the potential accumulated in CSS.
Dear feha, I really hope it. In other case, something can be rotten in Denmark. Because "potential" without USABILITY is NADA.
I hesitate between the less potent but honest CC and the other. Should I spend $100 more? This is my question...
George
|
|
|
|
|
