R Sens
|
| Posted: 05/31/2002, 9:33 AM |
|
Hello,
What I'm really missing is ASP 2.0 compatibility. A lot of Unix Servers are
using Chilisoft ASP. This might be a somewhat out of date ASP at the moment,
due to the fact that it does only support vbscript 3.2 engine instead of
5.x, but a lot of users (older users from CC2) and perhaps a lot of new
users would like to see ASP 2.0 still implemented. This is for me the reason
not to upgrade to Studio at the moment. Are there any plans of implementing
ASP 2.0, as you already left out ASP without Templates? It's nice to see
this major step forward, but compatibility is a major issue, which you
should definitely be aware of. I really think Chilisoft ASP has a lot of
users.
Ron
|
|
|
 |
CodeCharge Support
|
| Posted: 05/31/2002, 11:23 PM |
|
ASP 2.0 is supported by CodeCharge 2.0.
CodeCharge Studio is generating object oriented code and unfortunatelly
Chili!ASP cannot run such code.
There is not much we can do about this, however CodeCharge 2.0 is a viable
solution.
Konrad
"R Sens" <info@sensoft.nl> wrote in message
news:ad88lh$4n5$1@news.codecharge.com...
> Hello,
>
> What I'm really missing is ASP 2.0 compatibility. A lot of Unix Servers
are
> using Chilisoft ASP. This might be a somewhat out of date ASP at the
moment,
> due to the fact that it does only support vbscript 3.2 engine instead of
> 5.x, but a lot of users (older users from CC2) and perhaps a lot of new
> users would like to see ASP 2.0 still implemented. This is for me the
reason
> not to upgrade to Studio at the moment. Are there any plans of
implementing
> ASP 2.0, as you already left out ASP without Templates? It's nice to see
> this major step forward, but compatibility is a major issue, which you
> should definitely be aware of. I really think Chilisoft ASP has a lot of
> users.
>
> Ron
>
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
