Jean
|
| Posted: 06/21/2002, 4:54 PM |
|
Hi,
I have been following the debate on CCS vs. Web Matrix and not sure which
one to use. Does anyone know if CCS will generate ASP.NET pages in VB.NET ?
I am likely to choose Web Matrix just because it's our company standard to
code in VB.NET.
Thanks
Jean
|
|
|
 |
Dave Rexel
|
| Posted: 06/21/2002, 6:34 PM |
|
Jean,
I would wait for CCS because their solution builds whole sections of sites
with prebuilt functionality through a wizard-interface.
This is only the 1st version of this exceptional generator/editor. I am sure
lots of refinements are on the way.
You have to redo all pages in WebMatrix as you move from one
customer/department/DataBase to another. Afters 36 long hours testing it I
returned thankfully to CCS.
In CCS once you develop a good application logic you just copy the
project-folder to another renamed folder in your file-manager.
The new application only needs minor tweaking, DB-login, FTP-login etc and
is up and running in minutes.
The only reason I'll keep WebMatrix is it's free, but CCS will actually do
your work for you in most site-building scenarios.
The time and trouble it will save you will be realised in a few real-life
projects and more than return the purchase cost.
Greetings,
Dave
"Jean" <jhsi@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:af0ebg$je5$1@news.codecharge.com...
> Hi,
>
> I have been following the debate on CCS vs. Web Matrix and not sure which
> one to use. Does anyone know if CCS will generate ASP.NET pages in VB.NET
?
> I am likely to choose Web Matrix just because it's our company standard to
> code in VB.NET.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jean
>
>
|
|
|
|
Jean
|
| Posted: 06/22/2002, 12:05 AM |
|
Thanks, Dave.
"Dave Rexel" <therex_spamenot@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:af0k67$ssl$1@news.codecharge.com...
> Jean,
> I would wait for CCS because their solution builds whole sections of sites
> with prebuilt functionality through a wizard-interface.
>
> This is only the 1st version of this exceptional generator/editor. I am
sure
> lots of refinements are on the way.
>
> You have to redo all pages in WebMatrix as you move from one
> customer/department/DataBase to another. Afters 36 long hours testing it I
> returned thankfully to CCS.
>
> In CCS once you develop a good application logic you just copy the
> project-folder to another renamed folder in your file-manager.
>
> The new application only needs minor tweaking, DB-login, FTP-login etc and
> is up and running in minutes.
>
> The only reason I'll keep WebMatrix is it's free, but CCS will actually do
> your work for you in most site-building scenarios.
>
> The time and trouble it will save you will be realised in a few real-life
> projects and more than return the purchase cost.
>
> Greetings,
> Dave
>
> "Jean" <jhsi@attbi.com> wrote in message
>news:af0ebg$je5$1@news.codecharge.com...
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been following the debate on CCS vs. Web Matrix and not sure
which
> > one to use. Does anyone know if CCS will generate ASP.NET pages in
VB.NET
> ?
> > I am likely to choose Web Matrix just because it's our company standard
to
> > code in VB.NET.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jean
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
Robert Davis
|
| Posted: 06/25/2002, 9:30 AM |
|
I've been asking about VB.Net code generation in CCS for some time now.
I've seen no indication that they're either working on it or committed to
doing it. What do you know that makes you suggest to Jean to wait on CCS???
I'd have already bought CCS if it generated VB.Net code for ASP.Net; the
minute that it was announced, to be sure!!!
Your implying that there's reason(s) to believe that it's coming. I'd love
to know what factually makes you believe that. It'd be GREAT news!
Regards,
radbase@cox-internet.com
__________________________________________________________________________
Let me do you a dotFavor! >>> http://radbase.ehostingbiz.com/webcenter
The VERY BEST dotNet hosting available anywhere!!!
If you can beat the features/price/performance and support, I'd sure like to
KNOW ABOUT IT!!!
__________________________________________________________________________
.
.
.
"Dave Rexel" <therex_spamenot@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:af0k67$ssl$1@news.codecharge.com...
> Jean,
> I would wait for CCS because their solution builds whole sections of sites
> with prebuilt functionality through a wizard-interface.
>
> This is only the 1st version of this exceptional generator/editor. I am
sure
> lots of refinements are on the way.
>
> You have to redo all pages in WebMatrix as you move from one
> customer/department/DataBase to another. Afters 36 long hours testing it I
> returned thankfully to CCS.
>
> In CCS once you develop a good application logic you just copy the
> project-folder to another renamed folder in your file-manager.
>
> The new application only needs minor tweaking, DB-login, FTP-login etc and
> is up and running in minutes.
>
> The only reason I'll keep WebMatrix is it's free, but CCS will actually do
> your work for you in most site-building scenarios.
>
> The time and trouble it will save you will be realised in a few real-life
> projects and more than return the purchase cost.
>
> Greetings,
> Dave
>
> "Jean" <jhsi@attbi.com> wrote in message
>news:af0ebg$je5$1@news.codecharge.com...
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been following the debate on CCS vs. Web Matrix and not sure
which
> > one to use. Does anyone know if CCS will generate ASP.NET pages in
VB.NET
> ?
> > I am likely to choose Web Matrix just because it's our company standard
to
> > code in VB.NET.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jean
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
Dave Rexel
|
| Posted: 06/25/2002, 2:31 PM |
|
Robert and Jean
I'm afraid that I cannot find the post/article which lead me to this
conclusion. I did read this somewhere but I could have misinterpreted
something.
Sorry for the misunderstanding, I have an immense workload just now.
Regards
Dave
"Robert Davis" <radbase@texas.net> wrote in message
news:afa5s1$1vv$1@news.codecharge.com...
> I've been asking about VB.Net code generation in CCS for some time now.
> I've seen no indication that they're either working on it or committed to
> doing it. What do you know that makes you suggest to Jean to wait on
CCS???
> I'd have already bought CCS if it generated VB.Net code for ASP.Net; the
> minute that it was announced, to be sure!!!
>
> Your implying that there's reason(s) to believe that it's coming. I'd
love
> to know what factually makes you believe that. It'd be GREAT news!
>
> Regards,
>
> radbase@cox-internet.com
> __________________________________________________________________________
> Let me do you a dotFavor! >>> http://radbase.ehostingbiz.com/webcenter
> The VERY BEST dotNet hosting available anywhere!!!
> If you can beat the features/price/performance and support, I'd sure like
to
> KNOW ABOUT IT!!!
> __________________________________________________________________________
>
> .
> .
> .
>
>
> "Dave Rexel" <therex_spamenot@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:af0k67$ssl$1@news.codecharge.com...
> > Jean,
> > I would wait for CCS because their solution builds whole sections of
sites
> > with prebuilt functionality through a wizard-interface.
> >
> > This is only the 1st version of this exceptional generator/editor. I am
> sure
> > lots of refinements are on the way.
> >
> > You have to redo all pages in WebMatrix as you move from one
> > customer/department/DataBase to another. Afters 36 long hours testing it
I
> > returned thankfully to CCS.
> >
> > In CCS once you develop a good application logic you just copy the
> > project-folder to another renamed folder in your file-manager.
> >
> > The new application only needs minor tweaking, DB-login, FTP-login etc
and
> > is up and running in minutes.
> >
> > The only reason I'll keep WebMatrix is it's free, but CCS will actually
do
> > your work for you in most site-building scenarios.
> >
> > The time and trouble it will save you will be realised in a few
real-life
> > projects and more than return the purchase cost.
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Dave
> >
> > "Jean" <jhsi@attbi.com> wrote in message
> >news:af0ebg$je5$1@news.codecharge.com...
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have been following the debate on CCS vs. Web Matrix and not sure
> which
> > > one to use. Does anyone know if CCS will generate ASP.NET pages in
> VB.NET
> > ?
> > > I am likely to choose Web Matrix just because it's our company
standard
> to
> > > code in VB.NET.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Jean
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
CodeCharge Support
|
| Posted: 06/26/2002, 1:59 AM |
|
Hello,
We are currently working on VB.NET implmentation.
It should be available in August, with possible Beta release in July.
Konrad
"Jean" <jhsi@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:af0ebg$je5$1@news.codecharge.com...
> Hi,
>
> I have been following the debate on CCS vs. Web Matrix and not sure which
> one to use. Does anyone know if CCS will generate ASP.NET pages in VB.NET
?
> I am likely to choose Web Matrix just because it's our company standard to
> code in VB.NET.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jean
>
>
|
|
|
|
Kelvin Chua
|
| Posted: 06/26/2002, 3:45 AM |
|
Hi CodeCharge Team,
Glad to hear that, thanks!
Kelvin Chua
SINGAPORE
"CodeCharge Support" <support@codecharge.com> wrote in message
news:afbvqc$9se$1@news.codecharge.com...
> Hello,
>
> We are currently working on VB.NET implmentation.
> It should be available in August, with possible Beta release in July.
>
> Konrad
>
>
> "Jean" <jhsi@attbi.com> wrote in message
>news:af0ebg$je5$1@news.codecharge.com...
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been following the debate on CCS vs. Web Matrix and not sure
which
> > one to use. Does anyone know if CCS will generate ASP.NET pages in
VB.NET
> ?
> > I am likely to choose Web Matrix just because it's our company standard
to
> > code in VB.NET.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jean
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
