Frank Rocco
|
| Posted: 06/02/2001, 6:49 AM |
|
Hello,
Is anyone using Codecharge and Dreamweaver UltraDev 4?
Is there a benefit to having both products?
I need to have a product that can do a complete database driven site.
Codecharge for me is too complexe to add features not supported link frames,
and the ability to draw on a page or use drag and drop objects.
Thanks for the feedback.
Frank
|
|
|
 |
Kelvin Chua
|
| Posted: 06/02/2001, 6:58 AM |
|
Hi Frank,
Most probably you may have to wait till August for CodeCharge version 2.0
Thanks.
Kelvin Chua
SINGAPORE
"Frank Rocco" <farocco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9faqt4$dko$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> Hello,
>
> Is anyone using Codecharge and Dreamweaver UltraDev 4?
>
> Is there a benefit to having both products?
>
> I need to have a product that can do a complete database driven site.
> Codecharge for me is too complexe to add features not supported link
frames,
> and the ability to draw on a page or use drag and drop objects.
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Frank
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
Frank Rocco
|
| Posted: 06/02/2001, 7:37 AM |
|
Hi Kelvin,
Is there a feature list available for Codecharge 2.0?
Thanks
Frank
"Kelvin Chua" <NOkelvinSPAM@accpro.com.sg> wrote in message
news:9faref$duq$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> Hi Frank,
>
> Most probably you may have to wait till August for CodeCharge version 2.0
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kelvin Chua
> SINGAPORE
>
> "Frank Rocco" <farocco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:9faqt4$dko$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is anyone using Codecharge and Dreamweaver UltraDev 4?
> >
> > Is there a benefit to having both products?
> >
> > I need to have a product that can do a complete database driven site.
> > Codecharge for me is too complexe to add features not supported link
> frames,
> > and the ability to draw on a page or use drag and drop objects.
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> >
> > Frank
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
CodeCharge
|
| Posted: 06/02/2001, 11:43 AM |
|
I don't see the need for you to having both products. If you need design
capabilities, you may use CodeCharge and either DreamWeaver or FrontPage or
GoLive or HomeSite, etc. Or you may solely use Dreamweaver UltraDev.
CodeCharge 1.0 purposely does not have web design capabilities as we tried
to provide the best solution for generating usable code, not for web design,
for which there are many tools on the market already.
CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a basic graphical
interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an add-on for
FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite. That way you will
be able to drag and drop CodeCharge components directly onto a web page
within the above web editors.
We're trying to do this "correctly" so that the generated code and HTML
templates can continue to stay clean, and the generated code can be manually
modified and preserved during subseqent generations.
At this time there is no feature list available for ver. 2.0 as we are still
testing the limits of what can be done.
Adam Stock
"Frank Rocco" <farocco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9fatna$fem$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> Hi Kelvin,
>
> Is there a feature list available for Codecharge 2.0?
>
> Thanks
> Frank
>
> "Kelvin Chua" <NOkelvinSPAM@accpro.com.sg> wrote in message
>news:9faref$duq$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > Hi Frank,
> >
> > Most probably you may have to wait till August for CodeCharge version
2.0
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Kelvin Chua
> > SINGAPORE
> >
> > "Frank Rocco" <farocco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:9faqt4$dko$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Is anyone using Codecharge and Dreamweaver UltraDev 4?
> > >
> > > Is there a benefit to having both products?
> > >
> > > I need to have a product that can do a complete database driven site.
> > > Codecharge for me is too complexe to add features not supported link
> > frames,
> > > and the ability to draw on a page or use drag and drop objects.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the feedback.
> > >
> > > Frank
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
Frank Rocco
|
| Posted: 06/02/2001, 1:51 PM |
|
Thanks for letting me know. I tried Dreamweaver and do not like the code
generated for inserting records. I find it hard to change data in fields
prior to the insert action.
I'm not sure yet if Codecharge can handle developing our complete web site.
Please bear with me as I am new this and am trying to decide on the best
product. I may end up getting both.
Will 1.2 be out before my 30 day trial is up? I think I have 7 days left.
Regards,
Frank
"CodeCharge" <support@codecharge.com> wrote in message
news:9fbc4i$pb7$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> I don't see the need for you to having both products. If you need design
> capabilities, you may use CodeCharge and either DreamWeaver or FrontPage
or
> GoLive or HomeSite, etc. Or you may solely use Dreamweaver UltraDev.
>
> CodeCharge 1.0 purposely does not have web design capabilities as we tried
> to provide the best solution for generating usable code, not for web
design,
> for which there are many tools on the market already.
>
> CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a basic graphical
> interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an add-on for
> FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite. That way you will
> be able to drag and drop CodeCharge components directly onto a web page
> within the above web editors.
> We're trying to do this "correctly" so that the generated code and HTML
> templates can continue to stay clean, and the generated code can be
manually
> modified and preserved during subseqent generations.
> At this time there is no feature list available for ver. 2.0 as we are
still
> testing the limits of what can be done.
>
> Adam Stock
>
>
> "Frank Rocco" <farocco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:9fatna$fem$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > Hi Kelvin,
> >
> > Is there a feature list available for Codecharge 2.0?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Frank
> >
> > "Kelvin Chua" <NOkelvinSPAM@accpro.com.sg> wrote in message
> >news:9faref$duq$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > Hi Frank,
> > >
> > > Most probably you may have to wait till August for CodeCharge version
> 2.0
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Kelvin Chua
> > > SINGAPORE
> > >
> > > "Frank Rocco" <farocco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > >news:9faqt4$dko$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Is anyone using Codecharge and Dreamweaver UltraDev 4?
> > > >
> > > > Is there a benefit to having both products?
> > > >
> > > > I need to have a product that can do a complete database driven
site.
> > > > Codecharge for me is too complexe to add features not supported link
> > > frames,
> > > > and the ability to draw on a page or use drag and drop objects.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the feedback.
> > > >
> > > > Frank
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
Kelvin Chua
|
| Posted: 06/02/2001, 4:25 PM |
|
Hi Frank,
If you need to evaluate further, just install it again.
I had purchased CodeCharge with upgrades for a year.
Thanks.
Kelvin Chua
SINGAPORE
"Frank Rocco" <farocco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9fbjjk$ueq$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> Thanks for letting me know. I tried Dreamweaver and do not like the code
> generated for inserting records. I find it hard to change data in fields
> prior to the insert action.
>
> I'm not sure yet if Codecharge can handle developing our complete web
site.
>
> Please bear with me as I am new this and am trying to decide on the best
> product. I may end up getting both.
>
> Will 1.2 be out before my 30 day trial is up? I think I have 7 days left.
>
> Regards,
> Frank
>
>
> "CodeCharge" <support@codecharge.com> wrote in message
>news:9fbc4i$pb7$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > I don't see the need for you to having both products. If you need design
> > capabilities, you may use CodeCharge and either DreamWeaver or FrontPage
> or
> > GoLive or HomeSite, etc. Or you may solely use Dreamweaver UltraDev.
> >
> > CodeCharge 1.0 purposely does not have web design capabilities as we
tried
> > to provide the best solution for generating usable code, not for web
> design,
> > for which there are many tools on the market already.
> >
> > CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a basic graphical
> > interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an add-on for
> > FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite. That way you
will
> > be able to drag and drop CodeCharge components directly onto a web page
> > within the above web editors.
> > We're trying to do this "correctly" so that the generated code and HTML
> > templates can continue to stay clean, and the generated code can be
> manually
> > modified and preserved during subseqent generations.
> > At this time there is no feature list available for ver. 2.0 as we are
> still
> > testing the limits of what can be done.
> >
> > Adam Stock
> >
> >
> > "Frank Rocco" <farocco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:9fatna$fem$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > Hi Kelvin,
> > >
> > > Is there a feature list available for Codecharge 2.0?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Frank
> > >
> > > "Kelvin Chua" <NOkelvinSPAM@accpro.com.sg> wrote in message
> > >news:9faref$duq$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > Hi Frank,
> > > >
> > > > Most probably you may have to wait till August for CodeCharge
version
> > 2.0
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Kelvin Chua
> > > > SINGAPORE
> > > >
> > > > "Frank Rocco" <farocco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > >news:9faqt4$dko$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > Is anyone using Codecharge and Dreamweaver UltraDev 4?
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a benefit to having both products?
> > > > >
> > > > > I need to have a product that can do a complete database driven
> site.
> > > > > Codecharge for me is too complexe to add features not supported
link
> > > > frames,
> > > > > and the ability to draw on a page or use drag and drop objects.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the feedback.
> > > > >
> > > > > Frank
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
David Payer
|
| Posted: 06/02/2001, 5:39 PM |
|
> CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a basic graphical
> interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an add-on for
> FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite. That way you will
> be able to drag and drop CodeCharge components directly onto a web page
> within the above web editors.
> Adam Stock
Im not an owner of either yet but I read both forums :)
I will be using one or the other soon and am considering my options. I do
have a Front Page plug in that I like and use alot and you may want to use
them as a comparison. It is J-Bots at www.websunlimited.com. They allow you
to do alot of javascript by add-ins to FrontPage, they remain editable in FP
as well if you need to change them. This works well for me.
Go for it! I will keep watching.
David Payer
|
|
|
|
Webber
|
| Posted: 06/02/2001, 6:46 PM |
|
Don't forget NetObjects....I've been pushing CodeCharge in the NOF NGs and
there are many that would love to use CodeCharge as long as they can drop it
in the NOF gui.
--
=====
Best Regards,
Webber / version 1.0
Team NetObjects
http://www.mortgageyellowpages.com/
http://www.webschematics.com/
=====
"David Payer" <david.payer.no.spam.please!@ia-omni.com> wrote in message
news:9fc106$7ae$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a basic graphical
> > interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an add-on for
> > FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite. That way you
will
> > be able to drag and drop CodeCharge components directly onto a web page
> > within the above web editors.
> > Adam Stock
>
> Im not an owner of either yet but I read both forums :)
>
> I will be using one or the other soon and am considering my options. I do
> have a Front Page plug in that I like and use alot and you may want to use
> them as a comparison. It is J-Bots at www.websunlimited.com. They allow
you
> to do alot of javascript by add-ins to FrontPage, they remain editable in
FP
> as well if you need to change them. This works well for me.
>
> Go for it! I will keep watching.
>
> David Payer
>
>
|
|
|
|
Steven Dowd
|
| Posted: 06/03/2001, 3:10 AM |
|
yes , would be good to drop it into NOF , maybe thru the addon components
options somehow.
"Webber" <webber@mortgageyellowpages.com> wrote in message
news:9fc4u1$9gr$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> Don't forget NetObjects....I've been pushing CodeCharge in the NOF NGs and
> there are many that would love to use CodeCharge as long as they can drop
it
> in the NOF gui.
>
> --
> =====
> Best Regards,
> Webber / version 1.0
> Team NetObjects
> http://www.mortgageyellowpages.com/
> http://www.webschematics.com/
> =====
> "David Payer" <david.payer.no.spam.please!@ia-omni.com> wrote in message
>news:9fc106$7ae$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a basic
graphical
> > > interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an add-on for
> > > FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite. That way you
> will
> > > be able to drag and drop CodeCharge components directly onto a web
page
> > > within the above web editors.
> > > Adam Stock
> >
> > Im not an owner of either yet but I read both forums :)
> >
> > I will be using one or the other soon and am considering my options. I
do
> > have a Front Page plug in that I like and use alot and you may want to
use
> > them as a comparison. It is J-Bots at www.websunlimited.com. They allow
> you
> > to do alot of javascript by add-ins to FrontPage, they remain editable
in
> FP
> > as well if you need to change them. This works well for me.
> >
> > Go for it! I will keep watching.
> >
> > David Payer
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
stewart
|
| Posted: 06/03/2001, 7:13 AM |
|
please consider CC as a real program and don't limit it as an add-on!!!
maybe a CC lite as add-on but certainly i like to see CC as a nice real
program.
"Steven Dowd" <steven.dowd@dowd.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9fd2e3$qeo$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> yes , would be good to drop it into NOF , maybe thru the addon components
> options somehow.
>
>
> "Webber" <webber@mortgageyellowpages.com> wrote in message
>news:9fc4u1$9gr$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > Don't forget NetObjects....I've been pushing CodeCharge in the NOF NGs
and
> > there are many that would love to use CodeCharge as long as they can
drop
> it
> > in the NOF gui.
> >
> > --
> > =====
> > Best Regards,
> > Webber / version 1.0
> > Team NetObjects
> > http://www.mortgageyellowpages.com/
> > http://www.webschematics.com/
> > =====
> > "David Payer" <david.payer.no.spam.please!@ia-omni.com> wrote in message
> >news:9fc106$7ae$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a basic
> graphical
> > > > interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an add-on
for
> > > > FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite. That way
you
> > will
> > > > be able to drag and drop CodeCharge components directly onto a web
> page
> > > > within the above web editors.
> > > > Adam Stock
> > >
> > > Im not an owner of either yet but I read both forums :)
> > >
> > > I will be using one or the other soon and am considering my options. I
> do
> > > have a Front Page plug in that I like and use alot and you may want to
> use
> > > them as a comparison. It is J-Bots at www.websunlimited.com. They
allow
> > you
> > > to do alot of javascript by add-ins to FrontPage, they remain editable
> in
> > FP
> > > as well if you need to change them. This works well for me.
> > >
> > > Go for it! I will keep watching.
> > >
> > > David Payer
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
Steven Dowd
|
| Posted: 06/03/2001, 9:48 AM |
|
I do consider CC as a REAL program , i meant that it could be somehow
intergrated through NOF's component dev kit.
CC has db and code features that are not really available in any other
product that i have used, I would like to see some
sort of built in page/template editor though.
"stewart" <stewart@juiplio.net> wrote in message
news:9fdglv$7he$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> please consider CC as a real program and don't limit it as an add-on!!!
> maybe a CC lite as add-on but certainly i like to see CC as a nice real
> program.
>
>
> "Steven Dowd" <steven.dowd@dowd.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:9fd2e3$qeo$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > yes , would be good to drop it into NOF , maybe thru the addon
components
> > options somehow.
> >
> >
> > "Webber" <webber@mortgageyellowpages.com> wrote in message
> >news:9fc4u1$9gr$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > Don't forget NetObjects....I've been pushing CodeCharge in the NOF NGs
> and
> > > there are many that would love to use CodeCharge as long as they can
> drop
> > it
> > > in the NOF gui.
> > >
> > > --
> > > =====
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Webber / version 1.0
> > > Team NetObjects
> > > http://www.mortgageyellowpages.com/
> > > http://www.webschematics.com/
> > > =====
> > > "David Payer" <david.payer.no.spam.please!@ia-omni.com> wrote in
message
> > >news:9fc106$7ae$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > > CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a basic
> > graphical
> > > > > interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an add-on
> for
> > > > > FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite. That way
> you
> > > will
> > > > > be able to drag and drop CodeCharge components directly onto a web
> > page
> > > > > within the above web editors.
> > > > > Adam Stock
> > > >
> > > > Im not an owner of either yet but I read both forums :)
> > > >
> > > > I will be using one or the other soon and am considering my options.
I
> > do
> > > > have a Front Page plug in that I like and use alot and you may want
to
> > use
> > > > them as a comparison. It is J-Bots at www.websunlimited.com. They
> allow
> > > you
> > > > to do alot of javascript by add-ins to FrontPage, they remain
editable
> > in
> > > FP
> > > > as well if you need to change them. This works well for me.
> > > >
> > > > Go for it! I will keep watching.
> > > >
> > > > David Payer
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
Richard at 21ao
|
| Posted: 06/06/2001, 8:45 AM |
|
I agree, It would be great to integrate it easier with Netobjects.
I tend to find that netobjects is extremely good for the nice looking front
ends and use other programs such as Codecharge for the big stuff!
I have given a few people help on integrating CC for NOF but am still a
newbie. Shows how good it is!
Regards
RIch
"Steven Dowd" <steven.dowd@dowd.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9fdppn$dol$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> I do consider CC as a REAL program , i meant that it could be somehow
> intergrated through NOF's component dev kit.
> CC has db and code features that are not really available in any other
> product that i have used, I would like to see some
> sort of built in page/template editor though.
>
>
> "stewart" <stewart@juiplio.net> wrote in message
>news:9fdglv$7he$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > please consider CC as a real program and don't limit it as an add-on!!!
> > maybe a CC lite as add-on but certainly i like to see CC as a nice real
> > program.
> >
> >
> > "Steven Dowd" <steven.dowd@dowd.co.uk> wrote in message
> >news:9fd2e3$qeo$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > yes , would be good to drop it into NOF , maybe thru the addon
> components
> > > options somehow.
> > >
> > >
> > > "Webber" <webber@mortgageyellowpages.com> wrote in message
> > >news:9fc4u1$9gr$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > Don't forget NetObjects....I've been pushing CodeCharge in the NOF
NGs
> > and
> > > > there are many that would love to use CodeCharge as long as they can
> > drop
> > > it
> > > > in the NOF gui.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > =====
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Webber / version 1.0
> > > > Team NetObjects
> > > > http://www.mortgageyellowpages.com/
> > > > http://www.webschematics.com/
> > > > =====
> > > > "David Payer" <david.payer.no.spam.please!@ia-omni.com> wrote in
> message
> > > >news:9fc106$7ae$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > > > CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a basic
> > > graphical
> > > > > > interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an
add-on
> > for
> > > > > > FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite. That
way
> > you
> > > > will
> > > > > > be able to drag and drop CodeCharge components directly onto a
web
> > > page
> > > > > > within the above web editors.
> > > > > > Adam Stock
> > > > >
> > > > > Im not an owner of either yet but I read both forums :)
> > > > >
> > > > > I will be using one or the other soon and am considering my
options.
> I
> > > do
> > > > > have a Front Page plug in that I like and use alot and you may
want
> to
> > > use
> > > > > them as a comparison. It is J-Bots at www.websunlimited.com. They
> > allow
> > > > you
> > > > > to do alot of javascript by add-ins to FrontPage, they remain
> editable
> > > in
> > > > FP
> > > > > as well if you need to change them. This works well for me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Go for it! I will keep watching.
> > > > >
> > > > > David Payer
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
Kris
|
| Posted: 06/06/2001, 2:28 PM |
|
I would like to add my voice to this growing number of people, who want
NetObjects Fusion integration with CodeCharge. NetObjects is really a cool
stuff, and very user-friendly.
Best regards.
Richard at 21ao wrote:
> I agree, It would be great to integrate it easier with Netobjects.
>
> I tend to find that netobjects is extremely good for the nice looking front
> ends and use other programs such as Codecharge for the big stuff!
>
> I have given a few people help on integrating CC for NOF but am still a
> newbie. Shows how good it is!
>
> Regards
>
> RIch
>
> "Steven Dowd" <steven.dowd@dowd.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:9fdppn$dol$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > I do consider CC as a REAL program , i meant that it could be somehow
> > intergrated through NOF's component dev kit.
> > CC has db and code features that are not really available in any other
> > product that i have used, I would like to see some
> > sort of built in page/template editor though.
> >
> >
> > "stewart" <stewart@juiplio.net> wrote in message
> >news:9fdglv$7he$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > please consider CC as a real program and don't limit it as an add-on!!!
> > > maybe a CC lite as add-on but certainly i like to see CC as a nice real
> > > program.
> > >
> > >
> > > "Steven Dowd" <steven.dowd@dowd.co.uk> wrote in message
> > >news:9fd2e3$qeo$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > yes , would be good to drop it into NOF , maybe thru the addon
> > components
> > > > options somehow.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Webber" <webber@mortgageyellowpages.com> wrote in message
> > > >news:9fc4u1$9gr$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > > Don't forget NetObjects....I've been pushing CodeCharge in the NOF
> NGs
> > > and
> > > > > there are many that would love to use CodeCharge as long as they can
> > > drop
> > > > it
> > > > > in the NOF gui.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > =====
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Webber / version 1.0
> > > > > Team NetObjects
> > > > > http://www.mortgageyellowpages.com/
> > > > > http://www.webschematics.com/
> > > > > =====
> > > > > "David Payer" <david.payer.no.spam.please!@ia-omni.com> wrote in
> > message
> > > > >news:9fc106$7ae$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > > > > CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a basic
> > > > graphical
> > > > > > > interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an
> add-on
> > > for
> > > > > > > FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite. That
> way
> > > you
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > be able to drag and drop CodeCharge components directly onto a
> web
> > > > page
> > > > > > > within the above web editors.
> > > > > > > Adam Stock
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Im not an owner of either yet but I read both forums :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will be using one or the other soon and am considering my
> options.
> > I
> > > > do
> > > > > > have a Front Page plug in that I like and use alot and you may
> want
> > to
> > > > use
> > > > > > them as a comparison. It is J-Bots at www.websunlimited.com. They
> > > allow
> > > > > you
> > > > > > to do alot of javascript by add-ins to FrontPage, they remain
> > editable
> > > > in
> > > > > FP
> > > > > > as well if you need to change them. This works well for me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Go for it! I will keep watching.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > David Payer
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
|
|
|
|
Eddy
|
| Posted: 06/07/2001, 1:43 PM |
|
> NetObjects Fusion integration with CodeCharge ???
Sounds to me like the marriage of the year. The person(s) that can make this
work will be treated as God himself.
Just my point of view...
Eddy,
"Kris" <ksingh@lsuhsc.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1EA01D.9208BFAF@lsuhsc.edu...
> I would like to add my voice to this growing number of people, who want
> NetObjects Fusion integration with CodeCharge. NetObjects is really a cool
> stuff, and very user-friendly.
> Best regards.
>
> Richard at 21ao wrote:
>
> > I agree, It would be great to integrate it easier with Netobjects.
> >
> > I tend to find that netobjects is extremely good for the nice looking
front
> > ends and use other programs such as Codecharge for the big stuff!
> >
> > I have given a few people help on integrating CC for NOF but am still a
> > newbie. Shows how good it is!
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > RIch
> >
> > "Steven Dowd" <steven.dowd@dowd.co.uk> wrote in message
> >news:9fdppn$dol$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > I do consider CC as a REAL program , i meant that it could be somehow
> > > intergrated through NOF's component dev kit.
> > > CC has db and code features that are not really available in any other
> > > product that i have used, I would like to see some
> > > sort of built in page/template editor though.
> > >
> > >
> > > "stewart" <stewart@juiplio.net> wrote in message
> > >news:9fdglv$7he$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > please consider CC as a real program and don't limit it as an
add-on!!!
> > > > maybe a CC lite as add-on but certainly i like to see CC as a nice
real
> > > > program.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Steven Dowd" <steven.dowd@dowd.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > >news:9fd2e3$qeo$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > > yes , would be good to drop it into NOF , maybe thru the addon
> > > components
> > > > > options somehow.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Webber" <webber@mortgageyellowpages.com> wrote in message
> > > > >news:9fc4u1$9gr$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > > > Don't forget NetObjects....I've been pushing CodeCharge in the
NOF
> > NGs
> > > > and
> > > > > > there are many that would love to use CodeCharge as long as they
can
> > > > drop
> > > > > it
> > > > > > in the NOF gui.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > =====
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > Webber / version 1.0
> > > > > > Team NetObjects
> > > > > > http://www.mortgageyellowpages.com/
> > > > > > http://www.webschematics.com/
> > > > > > =====
> > > > > > "David Payer" <david.payer.no.spam.please!@ia-omni.com> wrote in
> > > message
> > > > > >news:9fc106$7ae$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > > > > > > CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a
basic
> > > > > graphical
> > > > > > > > interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an
> > add-on
> > > > for
> > > > > > > > FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite.
That
> > way
> > > > you
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > be able to drag and drop CodeCharge components directly onto
a
> > web
> > > > > page
> > > > > > > > within the above web editors.
> > > > > > > > Adam Stock
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Im not an owner of either yet but I read both forums :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I will be using one or the other soon and am considering my
> > options.
> > > I
> > > > > do
> > > > > > > have a Front Page plug in that I like and use alot and you may
> > want
> > > to
> > > > > use
> > > > > > > them as a comparison. It is J-Bots at www.websunlimited.com.
They
> > > > allow
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > to do alot of javascript by add-ins to FrontPage, they remain
> > > editable
> > > > > in
> > > > > > FP
> > > > > > > as well if you need to change them. This works well for me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Go for it! I will keep watching.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > David Payer
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
|
|
|
|
Seth Wagoner
|
| Posted: 06/12/2001, 6:40 AM |
|
> CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a basic graphical
> interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an add-on for
> FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite.
FWIW, I'm putting in a big vote for HomeSite support.
------------------------------------------------------
Seth Wagoner, Webfoundry Ltd
seth@webfoundry.co.nz - http://webfoundry.co.nz
|
|
|
|
Jeff Stuart
|
| Posted: 06/13/2001, 4:10 PM |
|
I'd like to put my vote in for DW and Homesite. GO MACROMEDIA! :D
--
Jeff Stuart
jstuart@neo.rr.com
"Seth Wagoner" <seth@webfoundry.co.nz> wrote in message
news:9g5656$7fe$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a basic graphical
> > interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an add-on for
> > FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite.
>
> FWIW, I'm putting in a big vote for HomeSite support.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Seth Wagoner, Webfoundry Ltd
>seth@webfoundry.co.nz - http://webfoundry.co.nz
>
>
|
|
|
|
Ann Harrell
|
| Posted: 07/10/2001, 2:20 PM |
|
If they shoot for Homesite they might as well make it work with Coldfusion
Studio
(which I have, of course)
Oh and NOF.
Ann Harrell
"Jeff Stuart" <jstuart-devel@neo.rr.com> wrote in message
news:9g8rsp$ls2$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> I'd like to put my vote in for DW and Homesite. GO MACROMEDIA! :D
>
> --
> Jeff Stuart
>jstuart@neo.rr.com
>
> "Seth Wagoner" <seth@webfoundry.co.nz> wrote in message
>news:9g5656$7fe$1@mail.tankhill.com...
> > > CodeCharge 2.0 is the next step where we will include a basic
graphical
> > > interface, as well as we plan to make it installable as an add-on for
> > > FrontPage, DreamWeaver, GoLive and potentially HomeSite.
> >
> > FWIW, I'm putting in a big vote for HomeSite support.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> > Seth Wagoner, Webfoundry Ltd
> >seth@webfoundry.co.nz - http://webfoundry.co.nz
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
