Clark
|
| Posted: 07/24/2004, 4:41 PM |
|
Greetings, I hope this question is ok in this forum. I have just learned of
CodeCharge and CodeCharge Studio and started reading about them.
I use FrontPage2000 and I want to get more database capability than FP itself
offers.
What I want from codecharge is the database / asp creation as an assist to
Frontpage. I am quite content with Frontpage as my web design program.
Can I get what I am after from just CodeCharge, or do I need Studio?
Advice?
Thanks
|
|
|
 |
Walter Kempees
|
| Posted: 07/27/2004, 7:48 AM |
|
Studio!
Check out www.codecharge.com
Supports ASP and FP.
Personal Studio available if you only need one language.
Greetz.
Walt
"Clark" <ckurtz@homepagedoctor.com> schreef in bericht
news:cdus44$ji9$1@news.codecharge.com...
> Greetings, I hope this question is ok in this forum. I have just learned
of
> CodeCharge and CodeCharge Studio and started reading about them.
>
> I use FrontPage2000 and I want to get more database capability than FP
itself
> offers.
>
> What I want from codecharge is the database / asp creation as an assist to
> Frontpage. I am quite content with Frontpage as my web design program.
>
> Can I get what I am after from just CodeCharge, or do I need Studio?
>
> Advice?
>
> Thanks
>
|
|
|
|
dhodgdon
Posts: 80
|
| Posted: 07/27/2004, 8:05 AM |
|
I am a new user to CCS and I had exactly the same desire.
Studio is the way and ASP is the place to start if you are using an MS server and MS Access because you don't have to buy any other software.
I have found that it is best to work in the CCS development tool most of the time. I switch to FrontPage 2000 when I want to do page formatting, graphics, table layout, etc. Ultimately, as I become more familiar with CCS I expect to go to FrontPage very little.
It has been worth bitting the bullet as they say and learning the CCS development system.
_________________
Regards,
David Hodgdon
|
 |
|
Clark
|
| Posted: 07/27/2004, 5:26 PM |
|
Thank you both for responding. I can see from your answers that I should go
with Studio. On the next site I plan, MySQL is made available as a database on
my web-hoster's server so I would plan to try working with that (I know Access,
but I think MySql will be needed for the traffic).
A NySql beginners question: When I work with FP and Access, I did all my
database / FP stuff locally and then published the whole shebang to the web
server and test it. Using CCS and MySql, would the process be the same? That is,
doing all the development locally with a local version of MySql, and then
publishing to the web server, or would I need to be working directly with the
database on the webserver during development?
Hope the question is clear ---
thanks
dhodgdon wrote:
> I am a new user to CCS and I had exactly the same desire.
>
> Studio is the way and ASP is the place to start if you are using an MS server
> and MS Access because you don't have to buy any other software.
>
> I have found that it is best to work in the CCS development tool most of the
> time. I switch to FrontPage 2000 when I want to do page formatting, graphics,
> table layout, etc. Ultimately, as I become more familiar with CCS I expect to
> go to FrontPage very little.
>
> It has been worth bitting the bullet as they say and learning the CCS
> development system.
> ---------------------------------------
> Sent from YesSoftware forum
> http://forums.codecharge.com/
>
|
|
|
|
dhodgdon
Posts: 80
|
| Posted: 07/28/2004, 9:32 AM |
|
CCS has two methods of publishing, local/network & remote (FTP). You can configure both and switch between them on the fly. This allows you to work with an http://localhost URL (as it sounds like you did in the past) for testing which is usually faster. I ran into database security issues when I started testing on the remote site that I didn't have locally. This was issues with IIS and Windows 2K Server and did not require any changes to the configuration or code. I use the same ODBC configuration local and remote to keep reconfiguration to a minimum.
If you test locally you still need to run the database via a web server on the local machine you post on. This is built in for MS Access with IIS (which I use), not sure for NySql.
_________________
Regards,
David Hodgdon
|
|
|
|
Walter Kempees
|
| Posted: 08/04/2004, 11:52 AM |
|
NySql being MySQL, the answer is, probably not for the Personal version (I
don't Use It, I don't know), that with Studio full, you could do both.
You could do (dhogdon) local MySQL on your platform of choice in combination
with MySQL and your hosts platform. OR
do local MsAccess and MySQL remote.
CCS gives you the opportunity to mix and match platforms as long as you know
how to initially fill the óther'platform.
Using msAcces local and MySql remote, several tool are available to dump th
MsAccess table data into a MySQL database.
In short, you should have some starter problems, but eventually (in a short
while actually) be up and building.
Good luck, come back for more if you need a kickstart.
Walter
kempe819 at planet dot nl
The Netherlands
"dhodgdon" <dhodgdon@forum.codecharge> schreef in bericht
news:64107d509bdb26@news.codecharge.com...
> CCS has two methods of publishing, local/network & remote (FTP). You can
> configure both and switch between them on the fly. This allows you to
work
> with an http://localhost URL (as it sounds like you did in the past) for
> testing which is usually faster. I ran into database security issues when
I
> started testing on the remote site that I didn't have locally. This was
issues
> with IIS and Windows 2K Server and did not require any changes to the
> configuration or code. I use the same ODBC configuration local and remote
to
> keep reconfiguration to a minimum.
>
> If you test locally you still need to run the database via a web server on
the
> local machine you post on. This is built in for MS Access with IIS (which
I
> use), not sure for NySql.
> _________________
> ____________________
> David Hodgdon
> ---------------------------------------
> Sent from YesSoftware forum
> http://forums.codecharge.com/
>
|
|
|
|
|
