greg
|
| Posted: 10/08/2004, 10:33 AM |
|
I'm trying to have my pages validated, and I found that CCS pages
doesn't pass mainly for two reasons:
- "img" don't have a default "alt" tags (sorters for example)
- links use & instead of &
Any experience on that?
Greg
|
|
|
 |
klwillis
Posts: 428
|
| Posted: 10/10/2004, 7:01 PM |
|
To me, a page is "validated" when it appears and behaves as expected.
I don't thing CCS pages will adhere to validation for several reasons,
including the ones you mentioned, but why is this a problem for you?
Just curious. 
_________________
Kevin Willis, VP/CIO
HealthCare Information Technology Specialist
http://www.nexushealthcare.com
"Fast - Convenient - Quality-Care"
Medical Software Consulting Services
Email : klwillis@nexushealthcare.com
Skype : klwillis2006 |
 |
|
greg
|
| Posted: 10/14/2004, 8:22 PM |
|
In a world where most of the dummies, sorry I mean the users, are
browsing with a "brain dead" browser, it appears very important to be
able to say "yes, I'm compliant with the standards". How could you be
sure a page appears and behaves as expected with so many bugs in IE?
Being W3C compliant is not a lot of work for the CCS team, and could be
a good argument.
I'm working on it, I'll release a patch when it's ready.
Greg
klwillis wrote:
> To me, a page is "validated" when it appears and behaves as expected.
>
> I don't thing CCS pages will adhere to validation for several reasons,
> including the ones you mentioned, but why is this a problem for you?
>
> Just curious.
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Sent from YesSoftware forum
> http://forums.codecharge.com/
>
|
|
|
|
|
