mamboBROWN
Posts: 1713
|
| Posted: 10/28/2005, 8:51 AM |
|
I really think that the popup window calendar is great but what would be even more awesome is the ability to choose between a pop calendar window or a DHTML calendar (which would include the time as well).
|
 |
 |
blankenb
Posts: 125
|
| Posted: 10/28/2005, 11:50 AM |
|
yes, yes
|
|
|
|
dragoon
Posts: 173
|
| Posted: 10/28/2005, 3:45 PM |
|
like this one ?
http://www.dynarch.com/projects/calendar/
|
|
|
|
DonB
|
| Posted: 10/28/2005, 7:27 PM |
|
I like it. 
--
DonB
http://www.gotodon.com/ccbth
"dragoon" <dragoon@forum.codecharge> wrote in message
news:224362aa1dc7e5a@news.codecharge.com...
> like this one ?
>
> http://www.dynarch.com/projects/calendar/
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Sent from YesSoftware forum
> http://forums.codecharge.com/
>
|
|
|
|
Edd
Posts: 547
|
| Posted: 10/28/2005, 9:25 PM |
|
Great product except the that the licencing costs are pretty awsome.
If you redistribute, $599 USD.
OUCH!
Edd
_________________
Accepting and instigating change are life's challenges.
http://www.syntech.com.au |
|
|
|
Vasiliy
Posts: 378
|
| Posted: 10/29/2005, 5:29 AM |
|
Quote :If you redistribute, $599 USD.
Edd, this also was my concern, but they have a GPL version.
_________________
Vasiliy |
|
|
|
Edd
Posts: 547
|
| Posted: 10/29/2005, 5:28 PM |
|
My understanding of the use of GPL (correct me if I am wrong) is that is free provided you make your code part of open source.
If you read that then when you create something for a client or your employer, with the component in it, the code is part of open source. My clients would not sign a waver for that (why should they) .
Edd
_________________
Accepting and instigating change are life's challenges.
http://www.syntech.com.au |
|
|
|
dragoon
Posts: 173
|
| Posted: 10/30/2005, 5:44 AM |
|
look at the license:
License: GNU Library or Lesser General Public License (LGPL)
GNU Library: licenses which are applicable only to module libraries, and state that the library modules may be embedded within commercial products, but the libraries are freely distributable.
you'll not sell the component itself, but your product....; also to be fully legitimate you may include in your copyright notice that your software includes 3rd party components and those you'll give credit to the authors.
|
|
|
|
Edd
Posts: 547
|
| Posted: 10/30/2005, 10:08 PM |
|
dragoon
Many thanks for the heads-up I was lead to believe the latter, hence the commecial licence and site licence of the product.
Regards
Edd
_________________
Accepting and instigating change are life's challenges.
http://www.syntech.com.au |
|
|
|
mamboBROWN
Posts: 1713
|
| Posted: 10/31/2005, 9:15 AM |
|
Yes dragoon, something along the lines of the link that you gave. I have also seen some other slick ones and if I can find the links I will provide them here.
|
|
|
|
