Heinrich
|
| Posted: 01/01/2006, 12:48 PM |
|
Is there any plans to support Ruby on Rails? It seems logical to provide this in a future version.
|
|
|
 |
robertmann
Posts: 109
|
| Posted: 01/01/2006, 1:58 PM |
|
I would prefer to see PRADO support. It also seems logical.
_________________
Robert |
 |
|
Benjamin Krajmalnik
|
| Posted: 01/02/2006, 5:53 PM |
|
Doubt it, since PRADO is a template based, event driven framework just the
same way CodeCharge is, with the downside of being PHP only.
Ruby on Rails requires that the Ajax backend run Ruby - therefore it is not
a match for CCS.
However, I believe what Heinrich would like to see is some level of real
time connectio to a backend to handle items such as dependent listboxes and
dependant controls in a seeamless fashion.
Search these newsgroups for Ajax. There is an excelentportable solution
which has already been posted here which uses XML if available with an
invisible IFRAME for fallback.
Works well.
I will be porting some of my code to that framework next year, consolidated
all sorts of background popup windows into a single, consolidated, Ajax data
provider procedure.
|
|
|
|
mikehoskins
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: 03/27/2006, 11:34 AM |
|
No, I think Heinrich wants full Ruby on Rails code output, as I do.
Why is having the Ajax backend running Ruby is an issue? PHP, Perl, Java, .net, and CFML all use their own API's and languages and CCS works just fine with all of them. I don't see how that's different.
|
|
|
|
roeya
Posts: 181
|
| Posted: 03/27/2006, 1:35 PM |
|
CCS code is not real MVC like RoR or Perl Catalyst
CCS is code generator that has good Logic - Presentation separation
But it does not have real controller - (You get many different scripts) you must implement controller using Hide-Show action dependent on URL param.
The model isn't real model because you just use auto generated SQL queries in the code
So CCS should support real MVC then you will not need RoR because CCS will create RoR like code just in other languages, maybe in Ruby too
_________________
http://www.infoneto.com/ |
|
|
|
mikehoskins
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: 03/30/2006, 10:21 AM |
|
Quote :So CCS should support real MVC then you will not need RoR because CCS will create RoR like code just in other languages, maybe in Ruby too
True, and adding Ruby as a language would be icing on the cake.
|
|
|
|
|
