roeya
Posts: 181
|
| Posted: 02/22/2006, 10:31 PM |
|
I have been using the new CCS 3.0 for some time for production and I have random problems design mode:
1. For reason I cannot understand the record object get mangled -
fields get out of the record or worse the Record tags (especially Panels) are corrupted
2. It keep adding & n b s p ; without reason even inside javascript blocks
3. when trying to enter label inside JavaScript functions I get problems because the labels { } are probably confused with JavaScripts { and } - and this was not a problem with CCS 2
4. more then once I lost all my custom event code when some thing in design mode messed up
Although CCS 3 feature set was improved it is not stable enough - try to loose three days work on custom code that for some reason was removed and left me with "add you custom code here" remarks...
Any update is expected some time soon ?
_________________
http://www.infoneto.com/ |
 |
 |
roeya
Posts: 181
|
| Posted: 02/23/2006, 12:45 AM |
|
One more thing
Do not understand that I think CCS 3 is step back !
CCS 3 is major step forward, but it has some random problems that should be resolved with time, as it was with CCS 2 I hope yesy will provide new versions to solve problems
_________________
http://www.infoneto.com/ |
|
|
|
wkempees
|
| Posted: 02/23/2006, 1:33 AM |
|
Did you post to Support?
|
|
|
|
wkempees
|
| Posted: 02/23/2006, 1:33 AM |
|
Non of these problems happening, as you describe.
|
|
|
|
peterr
Posts: 5971
|
| Posted: 02/23/2006, 1:56 AM |
|
I believe that & nbsp problem was submitted to support and should be resolved in a next update. I'm not sure about the other issues though.
We're working on CCS 3.1 with a few new features, however, 3.0 update may be released basically at any moment when various small fixes accumulate. It just takes a few days to prepare an update and test it, which puts everything else on hold. Thus we prefer not to do this too often unless there are major issue fixes or many minor ones to be released.
_________________
Peter R.
YesSoftware Forums Moderator
For product support please visit http://support.yessoftware.com |
|
|
|
davemalen
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: 02/23/2006, 4:25 AM |
|
Should I ask, should I - no I wont, I know you wont tell me what new features! lol
|
|
|
|
roeya
Posts: 181
|
| Posted: 02/23/2006, 4:58 AM |
|
Quote wkempees:
Non of these problems happening, as you describe.
Here is a way to duplicate some of the problems:
1. create new project
2. Use the CCSinternet connection for this example
3. create an includable page
4. Create record with i18n support for the article table
5. From design view locate and select res:articles
6. Now delete it
7. Goto HTML view and look
7.1 The form tag jumped before the < ! - - B E G I N _ R e c o r d _ a r t i c l e s - - >
7.2 same goes for the /form tag and you get a "bonus  " & n b s p ; < / s p a n > after the form
And thats not all - if your record was sorounded by panel then things are even worse ...
for some reason after manually fixing a page I lost all my custom code though this only happened twice in the last two weeks
For this reason I can hardly use design mode - because I do not know what will be the outcome of many operations !!
_________________
http://www.infoneto.com/ |
|
|
|
mamboBROWN
Posts: 1713
|
| Posted: 02/23/2006, 10:23 AM |
|
davemalen
It never hurts to ask. Besides the worst he could say is that well have to wait and see.
SOOOOOOOOOO peterr!!!!
Any chance of giving us a clue about 3.1 features  ??
|
|
|
|
roeya
Posts: 181
|
| Posted: 02/23/2006, 12:15 PM |
|
Quote mamboBROWN:
davemalen
It never hurts to ask. Besides the worst he could say is that well have to wait and see.
SOOOOOOOOOO peterr!!!!
Any chance of giving us a clue about 3.1 features ??
Already reported to support...
_________________
http://www.infoneto.com/ |
|
|
|
peterr
Posts: 5971
|
| Posted: 02/23/2006, 10:26 PM |
|
I wish I knew what those features will be 
_________________
Peter R.
YesSoftware Forums Moderator
For product support please visit http://support.yessoftware.com |
|
|
|
Jan K. van Dalen
|
| Posted: 02/24/2006, 7:39 AM |
|
Peterr ... I should know better than to ask but ... what new features? and
ETA?
|
|
|
|
Jan K. van Dalen
|
| Posted: 02/24/2006, 7:57 AM |
|
Ahaaaaaaaaaa questions answer on another message .... you see ... I should
have known better :)
|
|
|
|
peterr
Posts: 5971
|
| Posted: 02/24/2006, 10:49 AM |
|
Yeah
However, let me explain that we're not working specifically on version 3.1, but rather working on various new features and researching and prototyping other potential features. Once we have 2-3 new features finalized then they will be packaged as a next version: 3.1, later 3.2, etc.
ETA/dates are most difficult to estimate because potentially we could release version 3.1 very soon with only one new feature, but at the same time other features may be near completion and we may want to wait to include them as well. Certain features cannot be estimated at all because it can take a lot of discussions and prototyping to do some things properly and in a consistent way, even though our customers may hack CCS code and implement the same thing in a day.
_________________
Peter R.
YesSoftware Forums Moderator
For product support please visit http://support.yessoftware.com |
|
|
|
idh63
Posts: 76
|
| Posted: 02/26/2006, 4:22 AM |
|
I am fairly new to CCS3 but I would like to comment on the problem that roeya is reporting that I think may be a related bug (or the same).
I haven't got into adding Javascript yet but I get the 's and some other supurfelous code when adding and removing links from a cell. Ending up with partial <a href='s that aren't deleted in html view when you delete the Alink component in design mode.
Futhermore, I am finding that switching between design mode with a component focused to HTML view often looses the focus on the component and places the cursor near the to of the page. If you do back the design mode, set the focus on the next component, then switch back to HTML view, the focus is on the adjacent component you just selected in design mode. A minor annoyance really, but though I'd mention it.
|
|
|
|
