TheunisP
Posts: 342
|
| Posted: 08/03/2007, 8:04 AM |
|
I started noticing strange behaviour when parameters appended to links - you will get links with paramaters - when creating a new link 3.2 will keep piling parameters & values - without seperating with the and sign (&) breaking any following screens - key values, suddenly have parameter names as part of their value e.g.
http://www.getitat.co.za/getmoozik/pagegetMoozikAlbum.a...isteStockKey=75
strSearch=cleggintArtisteKey=3303 must have seperator between strSearch=clegg&intArtisteKey=3303
I'm past upset, I'm hitting hysterics - all my converted production systems are failing
1st - the lists stopped working
now this
how could such basic functionality be broken form one release to another - am starting to wonder if the NEW features were worth it?
|
 |
 |
TheunisP
Posts: 342
|
| Posted: 08/04/2007, 1:25 AM |
|
I assume everybody is as stunned as me, as the horror continues... my beautiful numeric key (s_intInventoryTypeKey) turn into ugly wet Gremlins fed after midnite (younger users will not understand this)
...ry.asp?s_intInventoryTypeKey=4intInventoryKey%3D9&intSIMReferralKey=9
yes, thats right s_intInventoryTypeKey is a numeric key, fed by a drop down (that works) but over a few pages it turns into this "4intInventoryKey%3D9&intSIMReferralKey=9"
|
|
|
|
wkempees
|
| Posted: 08/04/2007, 3:06 AM |
|
It rings a bell, you probably have to much light on your Gremlins.
You fail to describe where these links are used in:
A Form a Grid, or any other?
(have you contacted Support?)
Walter
"TheunisP" <TheunisP@forum.codecharge> schreef in bericht
news:246b438001dde8@news.codecharge.com...
>I assume everybody is as stunned as me, as the horror continues... my
>beautiful
> numeric key (s_intInventoryTypeKey) turn into ugly wet Gremlins fed after
> midnite (younger users will not understand this)
>
> ..ry.asp?s_intInventoryTypeKey=4intInventoryKey%3D9&intSIMReferralKey=9
>
> yes, thats right s_intInventoryTypeKey is a numeric key, fed by a drop
> down
> (that works) but over a few pages it turns into this
> "4intInventoryKey%3D9&intSIMReferralKey=9"
> ---------------------------------------
> Sent from YesSoftware forum
> http://forums.codecharge.com/
>
|
|
|
|
TheunisP
Posts: 342
|
| Posted: 08/04/2007, 4:10 AM |
|
the problem lies in the inherited parameters & values - you know how CCS 'remembers' previous URL parameters by adding it to all the links on a page - it is a great shortcut - meaning I don't need to pass specific parameters from page to page
what happens now is that the new paramaters & their values don't realize that there is already a parameter appended to the URL - so it doesn't use the & between it
yes, yesterday early - but I think they might to busy repairing all the damage they'v done
ps. walter, you had a look at the new features anything interesting to play with?
|
|
|
|
TheunisP
Posts: 342
|
| Posted: 08/04/2007, 6:52 AM |
|
support mailed me a patch - havent't tested it yet
|
|
|
|
Benjamin Krajmalnik
|
| Posted: 08/04/2007, 11:06 AM |
|
Let us know if this fixed it.
I have migrated to 3.2 but have not run into this.
Probably because the migrated project does a lot by setting session
variables via Ajax to prevent URL hacking.
"TheunisP" <TheunisP@forum.codecharge> wrote in message
news:246b484908a92b@news.codecharge.com...
> support mailed me a patch - havent't tested it yet
> ---------------------------------------
> Sent from YesSoftware forum
> http://forums.codecharge.com/
>
|
|
|
|
TheunisP
Posts: 342
|
| Posted: 08/04/2007, 2:52 PM |
|
recompiled one and it works now - what bothers me is that it seems all other users are oblivious to the bug - do they actually test their systems after uploading?
anyhow
>> I have migrated to 3.2 but have not run into this.
>> Probably because the migrated project does a lot by setting session
>> variables via Ajax to prevent URL hacking.
yes, ajax calls won't really be affected by the very nature of how they work - although the editor still tries to 'fix' my ajax sections, which it believes is not correct e.g. my divs etc.
|
|
|
|
DonB
|
| Posted: 08/04/2007, 5:54 PM |
|
I've not gone down the 3.2 path yet. I'm waiting for the brave pioneers to
step on all the beartraps before I venture into the woods. (well, that not
exactly my reasons)
--
DonB
http://www.gotodon.com/ccbth
"TheunisP" <TheunisP@forum.codecharge> wrote in message
news:246b4f522aa52c@news.codecharge.com...
> recompiled one and it works now - what bothers me is that it seems all
other
> users are oblivious to the bug - do they actually test their systems after
> uploading?
>
> anyhow
>
> >> I have migrated to 3.2 but have not run into this.
> >> Probably because the migrated project does a lot by setting session
> >> variables via Ajax to prevent URL hacking.
>
> yes, ajax calls won't really be affected by the very nature of how they
work -
> although the editor still tries to 'fix' my ajax sections, which it
believes is
> not correct e.g. my divs etc.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Sent from YesSoftware forum
> http://forums.codecharge.com/
>
|
|
|
|
E43509
Posts: 283
|
| Posted: 08/04/2007, 7:10 PM |
|
I migrated my apps to 3.2 and had no issues.
|
|
|
|
JimmyCrackedCorn
Posts: 583
|
| Posted: 08/04/2007, 7:45 PM |
|
Quote DonB:I've not gone down the 3.2 path yet. I'm waiting for the brave pioneers to
step on all the beartraps before I venture into the woods.
agree 101%! I would NEVER convert my live projects to a new version of a tool without waiting for the fireworks to stop! I do appreciate those of you willing to trigger the landmines. 
_________________
Walter Kempees...you are dearly missed. |
|
|
|
Vasiliy
Posts: 378
|
| Posted: 08/05/2007, 5:47 AM |
|
Converted .Net project developed from scratch on CCS3 - np, continue using 3.2.
Converted Classic ASP projects started in CCS 2.3 - problems in different places (mostly non-working links). No time to analyze, rolled back to CCS3.0 (different box).
_________________
Vasiliy |
|
|
|
grivers
Posts: 28
|
| Posted: 08/07/2007, 1:49 AM |
|
I always back up my projects before migrating to a new version just in case. I have encountered a few issues but nothing that can't be worked around such as syncronising html code when you remove fields from a grid.
|
|
|
|
dprechtl
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: 08/07/2007, 7:00 AM |
|
Killed mine too. We use a custom template and the new functions have wreaked havoc. Rolling back and waiting for things to settle down.
|
|
|
|
miko
Posts: 50
|
| Posted: 08/07/2007, 7:10 AM |
|
Have you tried to ask support?
I think the case with custom template is too difficult to discover during testing.
_________________
Regards,
Michael |
|
|
|
